Subject: Mead Lover's Digest #1472, 28 May 2010
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:07:30 -0600 (MDT)
From: mead-request@talisman.com


Mead Lover's Digest #1472                                  28 May 2010

                      Mead Discussion Forum

Contents:
  Re: Correction - Ultrafiltration in Ohio and not Reverse Osmosis (MeadGuil...)

NOTE: Digest appears whenever there is enough material to send one.
Send ONLY articles for the digest to mead@talisman.com.
Use mead-request@talisman.com for [un]subscribe and admin requests.
Digest archives and FAQ are available at www.talisman.com/mead#Archives
A searchable archive is at http://www.gotmead.com/mldarchives.html
Digest Janitor: Dick Dunn
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Correction - Ultrafiltration in Ohio and not Reverse Osmosis
From: MeadGuild@aol.com
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 07:02:30 EDT

Carl McMillin wrote:

> Sorry for the confusion.  You are absolutely correct.  Jilbert Winery in 
> Valley View, Ohio does NOT use reverse osmosis (which would only provide the 
> water/alcohol - but uses ultrafiltration using ultrafiltration cartridges.
 
Is an ultrafiltration system more practical for homebrewing than
the Buon Vino system?  You can self-define the term "practical".

Dick 
Richard D. Adams, CPA (Retired)
Ellicott City,  Maryland

------------------------------

End of Mead Lover's Digest #1472
*******************************